Flat 3, 21 Albany Road, Seaford, East Sussex BN25 2QB
HAV/21UF/LSC/2025/0661 · service charges · Lewes · decided 8 Sep 2025
The tribunal decided the respondent must pay £2,159.52 of unpaid service charges for 2022 to 2025, plus legal costs of £5,880 and interest of £114.21, as she did not challenge the charges.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Channel View 21 Albany Road Seaford Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,159.52 |
| Total found payable | £2,159.52 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's legal costs of £5,880 under the lease |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the property is one of 6 flats within the building
- freeholder
The Applicant is the Freeholder of the building
- years
service charges for the years ending September
- outcome
are payable by the Respondent in the sum of £2,159.52
- total demanded
are all unpaid in the total sum of £2,159.52.
- total payable
in the total sum of £2,159.52.
- costs
The Respondent must also pay the Applicant’s legal costs which, to date, amount to £5,880
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.