Flat 3, 193 Queen’s Gate, London SW7 5EU
LON/00BK/LSC/2022/0292 · service charges · Westminster · decided 29 Nov 2022
The tribunal found that the gas charges for the applicant's flat in 2019 were unreasonably high because the landlord failed to fix a gas contract, and set the payable amount at £791.21.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £791.21 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 12 flats in the 1980s
- freeholder
Respondents : 193 Queensgate Limited
- agent
the Respondent’s managing agents were Warwick Estates Property Management Limited (“Warwick Estates”)
- years
the supply of gas in the service charge year 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £791.21 is payable by the Applicant
- items reduced
we find that a reasonable charge for the supply of gas in 2019 is the sum charged under the 2020 price fixed contract
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £791.21 is payable by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.