Flat 3, 17 Winchester Road, Worthing, West Sussex BN11 4DJ
CHI/45UH/LBC/2018/0033 · breach of lease · Worthing · decided 26 Mar 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the respondent in breach of the lease by using his flat for Airbnb short-term lettings and by failing to keep the floors close carpeted, but found no breach over the alterations, and ordered him to reimburse half the tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | DK Majo Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant 50% of the tribunal fees paid |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there were 6 flats at Winchester Road (a building converted into flats)
- freeholder
Applicant : DK Majo Estates Limited
- costs
reasonable to order the Respondent to reimburse to the Applicant one half of the fees paid by the Applicant to the Tribunal
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.