Flat 3, 168 Sutherland Avenue, London, W9 1HR
LON/00BK/LSC/2021/0015 · service charges · Westminster · decided 21 Nov 2023
The tribunal found that no service charges are payable by the leaseholder for 2017 because the landlord failed to comply with section 20B(2), while service charges for 2018 to May 2021 are payable; the section 20C application was deferred.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £21,399.72 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into seven flats in around the 1980s
- years
the service charges years ending 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021
- outcome
No service charges are payable by Ms [name] for the year ending 2017.
- items reduced
No service charges are payable by Ms [name] for the year ending 2017.
- total demanded
The total amount in dispute is £21,399.72.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 22 Mar 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.