Flat 3, 155/163 Balham Hill, SW12 9DJ
LON/00BJ/LSC/2021/0168 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 29 Mar 2023
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for costs against the leaseholder, and ordered the leaseholder to pay £910 in County Court costs, with the landlord's solicitors' costs and its agent's claimed costs refused.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Crescent Trustees Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | ABC Estates |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant costs of £910 (small claims track fixed costs) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant (Claimant) : Crescent Trustees Limited
- agent
Representative : (ABC Estates)
- outcome
The Applicant’s rule 13(1)(b) Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 application is refused.
- costs
The Defendant must pay the Claimant’s costs, assessed in sum of £910 (small claims track fixed costs).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 23 Dec 2022.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.