Flat 28, Warwick Lodge, Shoot Up Hill, London, NW2 3PE

LON/00AE/LAC/2025/0609 · administration charges · Camden · decided 27 Oct 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that only one administration charge of £120 was payable, disallowed the other charges, ordered the landlord to refund £200 of the tribunal fees, and restricted the landlord from passing on its costs of the application.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not clear
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Carringtons Property Management
Building	One flat, 49 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2023
Items in dispute	administration charges, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges, legal and professional fees
Total demanded	£1,066.50
Total found payable	£120
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to refund the applicant £200 of tribunal fees

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: this block of 49 flats
freeholder: Respondent : Lindmead Properties Limited
agent: It employs Carringtons Property Management ("Carringtons") as managing agents.
outcome: The Tribunal therefore finds that the administration charge of £120 is payable, but disallows the further charges.
items reduced: The Tribunal therefore finds that the administration charge of £120 is payable, but disallows the further charges.
total demanded: The Applicant challenges the following administration charges which total £1,066.50
total payable: The Tribunal determines that administration charges of £120 are payable.
s20c: The Tribunal also makes an order under paragraph 5A of [name] 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 restricting the Respondent from passing on any of its costs in respect of this application to the Applicant.
costs: We therefore order the Respondent to refund to the Applicant 67% of the tribunal fees that it has paid, namely £200.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.