Flat 28, 73a Drayton Park, London. N5 1DW
LON/00AU/LAC/2019/0029 · administration charges · Islington · decided 11 Mar 2020
The tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide the administration charges for consent to assign because the leaseholders' solicitors gave an unambiguous undertaking to pay them, so the application was dismissed.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Stadium Development Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,080 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Stadium Development Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it has no jurisdiction to deal with the application by virtue of the operation of paragraph 5(4)(a) of Schedule 11
- total demanded
a total of £900 plus VAT or £1,080
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.