Flat 27, Wirethorn Furlong, Haddenham, Buckinghamshire, HP17 8LQ
CAM/11UF/LSC/2021/0050 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 16 Mar 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found no reserve fund contribution was payable for 2021/22, while cleaning was payable only up to £368.68 and repairs and maintenance only up to £800.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Catalyst Housing Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
this was by contrast a block of just 6 flats.
- years
for the service charge year of 2021/2022
- outcome
limited to £368.68 for the year (£39.01 pcm)
- items reduced
No sum is payable by the Applicant in respect of the estimated cost of a reserve fund;
- s20c
Mr [name] stated that he made no application for a s.20C order
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.