Flat 27 and parking bay 15, One Wycombe Square Aubrey Walk London W8 7JF
LON/00AW/LSC/2023/0364 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 15 Apr 2026
The tribunal decided that the security services costs of £408,384 and balcony repairs costs of £25,740 for the 2021 service charge year were reasonably incurred and payable by the leaseholder.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Parkgate Aspen Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant, Wycombe Square Freehold Limited is a resident-owned company.
- agent
Mr [name], of Parkgate Aspen Ltd (“Parkgate Aspen”), the Applicant’s managing agents
- years
payable by the Respondent, in respect of the 2021 service charge year
- outcome
The following costs were reasonably incurred by the Applicant and are payable by the Respondent in respect of the 2021 service charge year
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 24 Oct 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.