Flat 26 Hopwood Close, London SW17 0AG and 15 Barnfield Close, London SW17 0AU
LON/00BJ/LSC/2022/0214 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 11 Oct 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal held that the lessee repairing covenant excludes floors, so the company must repair the joist brackets while fixing plasterboard to the joists is the lessees' responsibility, and it made a paragraph 5A order stopping the litigation costs being recovered by administration charge but refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prior Estates Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Mr [name], the director of the managing agents, Prior Estates Ltd
- outcome
both sides have been partially successful in respect of how we have construed the lease
- s20c
(2) The Tribunal makes no order under section 20C of the 1985 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.