Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near WC1E 7LR

Flat 24 Milton Lodge Whitton Road Twickenham Middx TW 1BU

LON/00BD/LSC/2019/0228 · service charges · Camden · decided 28 Oct 2019

The tribunal found the unpaid service charges of £5233.36 reasonable and payable, rejected the leaseholder's counterclaim for overpayments for the period before 2003 and refused a set-off, and made no section 20C order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordMilton Lodge (Twickenham) Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2003
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£5,233.36
Total found payable£5,233.36
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
That there being no issue as to the reasonableness and payability of the service charges of £5233.36. The tribunal determines that this sum is reasonable and payable.
total demanded
the sum of £5233.36 unpaid service charges and court cost
total payable
The Tribunal found that the service charges of £5233.36 are reasonable and payable.
s20c
The tribunal makes no order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.