Flat 227, Tower Point, Sydney Road, EN2 6SZ
LON/00AK/LSC/2024/0730 · service charges · Enfield · decided 11 Aug 2025
The tribunal found most service charges payable but disallowed the conceded fire door charge and an excess service charge of £109.23, credited £13.63, held the flat-rate 5% interest charge of £1,184.20 not payable, and found the £100 and £10 administration charges payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sancroft Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Sancroft Properties Limited
- years
We therefore find that the period in which we are to determine the reasonableness and payability of service charges is 1 October 2019 – 29 May 2024.
- outcome
(1) The only service charges demanded that are not payable under the lease are the charges in relation to:
- items reduced
Section 20 – Fire Doors - £813.12 on 1 April 2023 – which has been conceded by the applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.