Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CR7 6JD

Flat 22 Silchester Court London Road Thornton Heath Surrey CR7 6JD

LON/00AH/LSC/2024/0273 · service charges · Croydon · decided 22 Apr 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the disputed balance of service charges of £7,174.03 not payable because the landlord failed to provide the required breakdown of charges, and the litigation costs of £5,202.28 were not payable as an administration charge because they had not been formally demanded.

OutcomeNot payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2022
Items in disputereserve fund, administration charges
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges
Total demanded£19,411.22
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
the service charges sum in dispute is not payable except for the admitted sum of £12,237.19
total demanded
The total service charge sum in dispute is £19,411.22.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.