Flat 21 Osiers Court, Steadfast Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey KT1 1PL

LON/00AX/LSC/2019/0092 · service charges · Kingston upon Thames · decided 2 Oct 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the respondent acted unreasonably in conducting the proceedings by failing to comply with directions, and ordered it to pay the applicant £4,230.18 in costs within 28 days.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not clear
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Osiers Court Properties Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2018
Items in dispute	not stated
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	£4,230.18
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to pay the applicant £4,230.18 within 28 days

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Osiers Court Properties Limited
years: service charges of the landlord in the year 2018
outcome: I find that the Respondents have acted unreasonably in the conduct of their defence in these proceedings.
total payable: I calculate therefore that the total sum allowable in respect of the costs of this application are £4,230.18
costs: I therefore order that it should pay the Applicant Mr [name] the sum of £4,230.18 within 28 days.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.