Flat 21, Constantine Court, Linthorpe Road, Middlesbrough, TS1 3GA
MAN/00EC/LBC/2020/0003 · breach of lease · Middlesbrough · decided 29 Sep 2020
The tribunal decided that the respondent leaseholder was not in breach of paragraph 4 of the Seventh Schedule of the lease, so the RTM company's application for a breach of covenant determination failed.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairhold Homes (No.9) Limited |
| Management company | Constantine Court (Middlesbrough) RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Town & City Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 74 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a flat on the first floor of a development comprising 74 flats
- freeholder
made between the Fairhold Homes (No.9) Limited (1) and Marjorie McDonagh (2)
- management company
Applicant : [name] Court ([name]) RTM Company Limited
- agent
Representative : Town & City Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal does not find Mr [name] in breach of the covenant contained within Paragraph 4 of the Seventh Schedule of the Lease as claimed by [name] Court.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.