Flat 203, Castle Court, The Minories DY2 8PG

CAM/00CR/LBC/2022/0011 · breach of lease · Dudley · decided 21 Nov 2022

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal dismissed the landlord's application that the leaseholder had breached the lease by allowing cannabis cultivation or subletting at the flat, finding no breach proven, and it extinguished the leaseholder's liability to pay the landlord's litigation costs under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Residential Freeholds Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	insurance, legal and professional fees, administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Applicant : Residential Freeholds Ltd
outcome: (1) The Application is dismissed.
s20c: Accordingly, no section 20C order needs to be made.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.