Flat 2, Wallace Avenue, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 5RA
CHI/45UH/LBC/2023/0014 · breach of lease · Worthing · decided 7 Feb 2024
The Tribunal found that the respondent leaseholder had not breached the lease covenants on repair, nuisance, leaks or the aerial, and made an order preventing the landlord from recovering its costs of the proceedings through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own costs of the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that for the purposes of section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 no breaches have occurred.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order preventing the Applicant from recovering the costs it has incurred in these proceedings though a Service Charge.
- costs
the Applicant is to bear the costs she has incurred to have this application heard.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.