Flat 2 Townsend House, 22-25 Dean Street, London W1D 3 RY
LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0258 · service charges · Westminster · decided 17 Feb 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found most of the charges for 2017 to 2019 reasonable and payable, disallowed a 2017 balancing charge under section 20B, recorded the landlord's concessions on duplicate lift charges and lack of consultation credits, made a section 20C order, and ordered reimbursement of the application and hearing fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse the applicant's application and hearing fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
in respect of the reasonableness and payability of the service charges for the years 2017, and 2018, 2019 and 2020.
- outcome
The Tribunal is not satisfied that the sum claimed is payable.
- items reduced
Accordingly the Tribunal find that Mr [name] had not received the letter and that as the sum claimed was caught by Section 20B.
- s20c
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to make an order.
- s20
Mr [name] agreed that the Respondent had not been consulted in accordance with
- costs
The Tribunal also orders reimbursement of the Applicant’s application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.