Flat 2, The Hartleys, 6-8 Hartley Road, Exmouth EX8 2SG
CHI/18UB/LBC/2019/0050 · breach of lease · East Devon · decided 19 May 2020
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application that the leaseholder breached the lease by leaving garden furniture on the managed land, because the evidence did not show on the balance of probabilities that the breach occurred.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Danesdale Land Limited |
| Management company | Remus Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Remus Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 17 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The lessor’s title consists of 17 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Danesdale Land Limited
- management company
Representative : Remus Management Limited
- agent
Remus Management Limited who are the Applicant’s managing agents and representative in this application
- outcome
the Applicant’s application to the Tribunal is dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.