Flat 2 Saldavian Court, Slaney Road, Walsall, WS2 9AG
BIR/00CU/LIS/2019/0038 · LIS · Walsall · decided 9 Jan 2020
The Tribunal struck out the leaseholder's defence and entered summary judgment for the RTM company for the full amount claimed, because the leaseholder was bound by an earlier decision that the company had properly acquired the right to manage and his abuse of process argument had already been decided against him.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Saldavian Court RTM Limited |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Limited |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay costs assessed at £8,014.80 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant/Claimant : Saldavian Court RTM Limited
- agent
It has appointed Residential Management Group Limited as its managing agent for Saldavian Court.
- outcome
summary judgment was to be entered for the Claimant to the full extent of its claim
- costs
Costs were and are accordingly assessed in the sum of £8,014.80.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.