Flat 2, Park Court, Foregate Street, Chester, CH1 1JG
MAN/13UB/LSC/2019/0072 · service charges · Cheshire West and Chester · decided 30 Jan 2020
The respondent confirmed that no service charges are payable for 2017/18 to 2019/20, the applicant withdrew her application, and the respondent was ordered to pay her costs of £1000 plus VAT and the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to pay the applicant's costs of £1000 plus VAT and the application fee of £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent is the freeholder, [name] Properties Limited.
- years
for the years 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020.
- outcome
The substantive application upon the issue of the reasonableness and payability of the service charges for those years is withdrawn.
- costs
The Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs in the sum of £1000 plus Vat together with the application fee of £100
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.