Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CR0 6TP

Flat 2, Mistral Court, 62 Leslie Park Road, Croydon CR0 6TP

LON/00AH/LSC/2025/0786 · service charges · Croydon · decided 17 Oct 2025

The tribunal determined the service charges for the years 2017 to 2020 item by item, allowing only part of several charges, including management fees, the reserve fund and cleaning, and made no costs order against either side.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordLeslie Park Court Management Co Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2018
Items in disputeadministration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducedcleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, reserve fund
Total demanded£12,162.51
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedno order for costs

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
[name] Park Court Management Co Ltd,
years
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2018
outcome
We accept the tenant’s evidence and submissions and allow only £2,500.
items reduced
We disallow this head completely.
total demanded
claimed against the respondent defendant the sum of £12,162.51

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.