Flat 2, Charlton Court, High Street, South East Ham, London, E6 6JD

LON/00BB/LSC/2025/0742 · service charges · Newham · decided 4 Dec 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal reduced the £462.30 legal fee to £150, found the £310.50 intercom call-out payable, disallowed the £192 settee removal charge, and ordered the landlord side to refund half of the tribunal fees.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Grandglobe Ventures Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	legal and professional fees, other
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to refund 50% of the tribunal fees (£55)

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Grandglobe Ventures Limited
outcome: (i) Legal Expenses (£462.30): £150 is payable.
items reduced: (iii) Settee Removal (£192): This is disallowed.
s20c: she does not wish to make an application under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Act
costs: The Tribunal therefore orders the Respondent to refund 50% of the tribunal fees (£55) that she has paid.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.