Flat 2, 63 Cadogan Gardens, London, SW3 2RA
LON/00AW/LSC/2022/0003 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 12 Dec 2022
The tribunal rejected the applicant's arguments on apportionment and kept the leaseholder's share at 35.44%, then cut the sinking fund to £18,000 a year, limited the concierge charge to £3,000 a year, and reduced or disallowed many other items; the section 20C application is still to be decided.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
is in a block of just three flats
- freeholder
Respondent : International Property Rentals Limited
- years
2014-2015
- outcome
Accordingly, this service charge is unreasonable and is disallowed in full and set at £nil.
- items reduced
Accordingly, this service charge is unreasonable and is disallowed in full and set at £nil.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.