Flat 2, 51 Tisbury Road Hove BN3 3BL
CHI/00ML/LBC/2019/0015 · breach of lease · Brighton and Hove · decided 18 Sep 2019
The Tribunal determined that the leaseholder breached the lease by subletting the flat on Airbnb for short-term holiday lets, which was not use as a private dwellinghouse.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
An application on behalf of the landlord, 51 Tisbury Road Limited, was
- outcome
the Tribunal determines pursuant to Section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that a breach of covenant of the lease has occurred
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.