Flat 2, 5 Alexander Street, London W2 5NT
LON/00BK/LSC/2023/0389 · service charges · Westminster · decided 17 Mar 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal limited the respondent's liability for the landlord's legal costs of earlier proceedings under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to 70% of the costs claimed, namely £5,943, payable within 28 days.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Heli Properties LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £8,490 |
| Total found payable | £5,943 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been converted into seven flats
- outcome
to 70% of the costs claimed, namely £5,943.
- items reduced
to 70% of the costs claimed, namely £5,943.
- total demanded
a variable administration charge in the sum of £8,490.00
- total payable
namely £5,943
- s20c
It is therefore not necessary to make an order under section 20C of the 1985 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 22 Apr 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.