Flat 2, 42 Montrell Road, London SW2 4QB
LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0752 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 6 Oct 2025
The tribunal granted dispensation from the failed consultation for the Section 20 major works only on conditions, deducting £3,000 for unlaid turf, a substituted side gate and unidentified electrical work, so the leaseholder's share payable is £6,680, and the applicant must pay the dispensation costs.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Goldpoint Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | £7,180 |
| Total found payable | £6,680 |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant to pay the costs of the dispensation application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Goldpoint Investments Limited
- outcome
the sum of £6,680 is reasonably incurred and payable by the Respondent for the service charge claimed in respect of the Section 20 Works
- items reduced
the Applicant deduct £1,000 from the service charge claimed in respect of the Section 20 works in compensation for the turf that was not laid
- total demanded
in which the Applicant claimed £7,180 for unpaid Service Charges
- total payable
the sum of £6,680 is reasonably incurred and payable by the Respondent
- s20
the Applicant belatedly accepted that it failed to consult with the Respondent in respect of the Section 20 works
- costs
the Applicant pay the costs of the dispensation application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.