Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CR8 1DU

Flat 2, 28 Grasmere Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 1DU

LON/00AH/LSC/2022/0033 · service charges · Croydon · decided 6 Sep 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal allowed some disputed service charges in reduced amounts, disallowed items such as the Astroturf works, draught excluder and unfinished decorating, and made an order preventing the landlord from recovering its costs of the proceedings through the service charge.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in dispute2021, 2022
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducedcleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance
Total demanded£20,351.25
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
The Respondents, Assethold Limited are the freeholders of the premises.
years
The Applicant's challenge is brought in relation to the service charge years 2021 and 2022.
outcome
Accordingly the Tribunal allows nothing for the cost of the works to the Astroturf.
items reduced
Wall plate -the tribunal was surprised that only one plate had been applied
total demanded
The total amount in dispute is £20,351.25.
s20c
The Tribunal will exercise its discretion to prevent the Respondents from recovering any costs incurred in these proceedings from any of the leaseholders at Grasmere Road.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.