Flat 2 260 Finchley Road, London, NW3 7AA

LON/00AG/LSC/2020/0223 · service charges · Camden · decided 7 Apr 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal dismissed the leaseholders' challenge to the £50,000 reserve fund contribution, finding it justified by the planned preventive maintenance schedule, and made an order that the landlord cannot add its costs of the case to the service charge.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Property Partners Management Limited
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2016, 2021
Items in dispute	reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent: the Managing Agents, Property Partners Management Limited submitted a statement
years: for the period between 2016 and 2021
outcome: the application should be dismissed
s20c: an order pursuant to section 20C should be made

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.