Flat 2 26 Elsham Road London W14 8HB
LON/00AW/LBC/2019/0097 · breach of lease · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 24 Mar 2020
The Tribunal found the leaseholder in breach of several lease covenants, including windows disrepair, unauthorised holiday lettings, nuisance, and floor covering, but found no breach of clause 2(5) or paragraph 4 of the Fourth Schedule, and made no costs order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 26 Elsham Road Management Company LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a stucco fronted Victorian block of 4 flats over 5 floors
- freeholder
The Applicant, 26 [name] Road Management Company LLP, holds the freehold interest in 26 [name] Road
- outcome
The Tribunal has determined that the Respondent is in breach of the following terms of the lease of the subject property
- s20c
The Tribunal makes no order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 198
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.