Flat 2, 133 Marina, St Leonards On Sea , East Sussex, TN38 0BT;
HAV/21UD/LSC/2024/0637 · service charges · Hastings · decided 17 Jul 2025
The tribunal determined that the respondent leaseholder must pay the service charges claimed for the years 2018 to 2024 and the 2025 budget on account, as set out by year, and made no order on costs.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Arko Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : 133 Marina Limited
- agent
Representative : Arko Property Management
- years
in the service charge year of 2018-2019.
- outcome
(1) The tribunal determines the following service charge amounts are payable by the respondent for the following years;
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.