Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW2 1AH

Flat 2, 112B Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1AH

LON/00AY/LSC/2022/0266 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 22 May 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the leaseholder must pay £26,326.45 of unpaid service charges for 2016 to 2022, after the landlord conceded the estate charges.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 3 flats
Service charge years in dispute2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducedother
Total demanded£27,063.27
Total found payable£26,326.45
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years
service charge years 2016-2022
outcome
That concession reduces the total amount claimed in unpaid service charges to £26,326.45.
items reduced
the Applicant conceded amounts claimed under the heading “estate charges”
total demanded
The amount sought in the application for unpaid service charges for that period was £27,063.27.
total payable
The tribunal determines that the sum of £26,326.45 is payable by the

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.