Flat 2, 110 Eaton Square, London SW1W 9AA
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/1185 · service charges · Westminster · decided 17 Jun 2026
The Tribunal found the estimated service charge demands and the legal cost administration charges valid and recoverable in the sums demanded, found the service charge sums reasonable, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a house converted into three flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Eaton Square Properties Limited
- years
in respect of the service charge year 1 April 2025 to 31
- outcome
The Tribunal finds the sums demanded on account of service charge to have
- s20c
the Tribunal determines that it would not be just and equitable in the circumstances for orders to be made under section 20C
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.