Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RM1 1SY

Flat 18 162-166 Southbury Court, South Street, Romford, London, RM1 1SY

LON/00AR/LSC/2021/0433 · service charges · Havering · decided 11 Jul 2023

The tribunal found only part of the disputed service charges for the years ended 2021 and 2022 payable, totalling 8385 pounds including VAT, and ordered that the landlord's costs of the tribunal proceedings cannot be passed through the service charge.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordMetta Properties Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentDevon Block Management Ltd
BuildingA block
Service charge years in dispute2021
Items in disputemanagement fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedmanagement fees, other
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£8,385
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Metta Properties Limited
agent
the Freeholder appointed Devon Block Management Ltd
years
for the years ended 31 March 2021 and 31 March 2022
outcome
the following sums are payable and reasonable (as service charge)
items reduced
£1,200 incl VAT for general administrative expenses incurred by DBM in managing the block
total payable
Grand total: £8,385 incl VAT
s20c
orders that no such costs will be chargeable

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.