Flat 17, Salisbury House, 8 Melbourne Road, Wallington, Surrey, SM6 8SA
LON/00BF/LSC/2025/1000 · service charges · Sutton · decided 13 Feb 2026
The tribunal found the 2022 to 2024 service charges for the flat payable by the applicant, with the landlord's costs of the proceedings barred from being added to the service charge under section 20C and paragraph 5A, and it recorded the reserve fund challenge as outside its jurisdiction.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | FirstPort Property Services Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | FirstPort Property Services Limited |
| Building | One flat, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose-built block of 27 flats
- freeholder
Representative : FirstPort Property Services Limited
- years
for the following service charge years; 2022, 2023, and 2024
- outcome
are payable by the Applicant
- s20c
The Tribunal does make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.