Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near N15 5JF

Flat 17 Mimosa Court, 29 Avenue Road, London N15 5JF

LON/00AP/LSC/2018/0437 · service charges · Haringey · decided 7 Jun 2019

The tribunal found the leaseholder owes £744.60 in arrears after disallowing reserve fund contributions and a major works payment that the lease did not permit to be demanded.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentSterling Estates Management
BuildingOne flat, 23 flats
Service charge years in dispute2014, 2015, 2016
Items in disputeadministration charges, major works, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedmajor works, reserve fund
Total demanded£5,433.68
Total found payable£744.60
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
containing some 23 flats in all
agent
The applicant was represented by Mr [name] of Sterling Estates Management (SEM) at the hearing
years
in respect of the service charge years 2014-2016
outcome
our decision reduces this to £744.60
items reduced
we disallow as unreasonable the £5,000 included for a reserve fund
total demanded
the alleged amount owing in service charge arrears was £5,433.68
total payable
Our decision reduces this to £744.60.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.