Flat 17 Claremont Lodge, 15 The Downs, London, SW20 8UA

LON/00BA/LSC/2022/0317 · service charges · Merton · decided 27 Feb 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the leaseholder had been overcharged because the building costs were apportioned at 20% instead of the 10.52% the lease provides, so he is entitled to a refund of £113.76, and the landlord cannot add its legal costs to the service charge.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Claremont Lodge (Wimbledon) Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	other, repairs and maintenance
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: The Respondents are [name] Lodge (Wimbledon) Limited.
outcome: The Tribunal confirms that the Applicant is entitled to a refund of £113.76
items reduced: The Tribunal confirms that the Applicant is entitled to a refund of £113.76

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.