Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NN10 0AT

Flat 16 Denbeigh House, Hamblin Court, Rectory Road, Rushden, Northamptonshire NN10 0AT

CAM/34UF/LBC/2023/0005 · breach of lease · North Northamptonshire · decided 9 Sep 2024

The tribunal determined that the leaseholders breached their lease by keeping a dog without the landlord's written consent, but found no breach based on the dog causing annoyance to other residents.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordWarrenden Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentNorthants Property Management Limited
BuildingOne flat, 72 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputecleaning and grounds
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising a mix of 72 flats and 7 shops within five separate blocks
freeholder
Applicant : Warrenden Limited
agent
[name] of Northants Property Management Limited, who manage Hamblin Court on behalf of the Applicant
outcome
(1) The Tribunal determines that for the purposes of section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, the Respondents have breached Clause 2 and paragraph 5 of the First Schedule to their Lease

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.