Flat 15 Omega Works, 4 Roach Road London E3 2PD
LON/00BG/LSC/2023/0032 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 19 Jun 2023
The tribunal found £150 in administration charges recoverable from the respondent under the lease and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, but declined to determine the reasonableness of £1,450 in legal costs not yet demanded and remitted that issue to the county court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Omegaworks 3 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Haus Block Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 57 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £150 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant is the registered freehold proprietor of Flats 1-57, [name] Works, 4 [name] Road, London, E3 2PD
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] 3 Ltd
- agent
The freehold is managed by Haus Block Management Limited
- outcome
Administration charges totalling £150 are recoverable from the Respondent by virtue of Sched 11 para 1 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
- total payable
Administration charges totalling £150 are recoverable from the Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.