Flat 15 Daynor House, Quex Road, London NW6 4PR
LON/00AG/LBC/2024/0033 · breach of lease · Camden · decided 5 Dec 2024
The tribunal found that the leaseholder breached a lease covenant by installing a functioning kitchen in the living room without the landlord's consent, and ordered the application fee of £110 to be repaid.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Daynor House Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the application fee of £110 within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The block contains 15 one-bedroom flats.
- freeholder
Daynor House Limited (“the applicant”) hold the freehold interest in the property under title number LN210475.
- outcome
The Tribunal has determined that the Respondent is in breach of Clause 2(13) of the lease for Flat 15 Daynor House, Quex Road, London NW6 4PR.
- costs
The Respondent is ordered to repay the application fee in the sum of £110 within 28 days of the date of this decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.