Flat 15 Beechcroft Close, Valley Road, London, SW16 2EW
LON/00AY/LSC/2019/0150 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 15 Nov 2019
The tribunal found £1,752.20 payable for service charges for 2018/19, rejecting the respondent's set-off claim because it had already been determined in earlier proceedings, and ordered him to refund the application fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,752.20 |
| Total found payable | £1,752.20 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fees of £200 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the service charges for the years 2018/19
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £1,752.20 is payable by the Respondent in respect of the service charges for the years 2018/19.
- total demanded
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £1,752.20 is payable
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £1,752.20 is payable
- costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £200 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.