Flat 14, Napier Court West, Gordon Road, Southend on Sea, Essex SS1 1NH
CAM/00KF/LBC/2022/0008 · breach of lease · Southend-on-Sea · decided 2 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the landlord's major works service charges claimed from the tenant are recoverable, rejecting his challenges on consultation, fractions and the contract award.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Gordon Place Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Metta Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,810.12 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Gordon Place Management Company Ltd
- agent
the current managing agents, Metta Property Management Ltd (“Metta”)
- outcome
we find that the cost of the service charges claimed by the landlord against the tenant in the County Court proceedings are recoverable by the landlord.
- total demanded
It claimed (a) £2,810.12 in respect of the costs of the major works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.