Flat 14 Elizabeth Court, The Crescent, Eastleigh SO50 9TA
CHI/24UD/LBC/2023/0002 · breach of lease · Eastleigh · decided 19 May 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the landlord's application for a finding that the leaseholder breached the lease by storing and charging a mobility scooter in the communal lounge, because the landlord had not proved the breach on the balance of probabilities.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Elmbirch Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Remus Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 33 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Elizabeth Court is a purpose built block of 33 flats constructed in the
- freeholder
The Applicant holds the freehold of the property known as Elizabeth
- agent
On the 5 October 2022 Remus wrote to all leaseholders
- outcome
dismisses the Applicant’s application under
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.