Flat 14 Denbeigh House, Hamblin Court, Rectory Road, Rushden, Northants NN10 0AT
CAM/34UD/LSC/2019/0010 · service charges · North Northamptonshire · decided 27 Aug 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal determined that the service charges for 2016 to 2018 and the CCTV and rewiring major works charge were reasonable and payable by the respondent, with the agreed outstanding balance of £1639.00, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 22 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,441.72 |
| Total found payable | £1,639 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charges said to be due for 2016, 2017, and 2018
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the following costs are reasonable and payable
- total payable
Total £1639.00
- s20c
the Tribunal considers that such an order would not be appropriate
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.