Flat 135 Sugar Quay, 1 Water Lane, London EC3R 6AP
LON/00AA/LSC/2025/0619 · service charges · City of London · decided 8 Jul 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's service charge application because she failed to identify the specific charges in dispute, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | First Port Property Services No 5 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : First Port Property Services No 5 Ltd
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2019-2020 to 2029-2030
- outcome
The application is dismissed.
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.