Flat 125 The Cherry Building(s) 125 Addenbrookes Road Trumpington Cambridge CB2 9BA
CAM/12UB/LSC/2019/0078 · service charges · Cambridge · decided 24 Apr 2020
The tribunal found the 2017/18 service charges payable by the leaseholder were £3,288.75 after reducing several items, and made no order for costs or under section 20C.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | SDL Estate Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Total demanded | £3,392.73 |
| Total found payable | £3,288.75 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : RMB102 Limited
- agent
It appears that the relevant managing agents were SDL Estate Management until 30 June 2018
- years
in respect of the 2017/18 service charge year.
- outcome
are in the sum of £3,288.75
- items reduced
Conclusion Deduct £360 from Schedule 5 expenditure
- total demanded
The total service charges for 2017/18 were £3,392.73
- total payable
are in the sum of £3,288.75
- s20c
the tribunal does not consider it just and equitable to make such an order
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.