Flat 12 Lea Court, 143 Broad Lane, London, N15 4QH
LON/00AP/LSC/2024/0126 · service charges · Haringey · decided 22 Nov 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal struck out the leaseholder's challenge to his interim service charge for 2023/24 and 2024/25 because he failed to file the required bundle of documents and did not attend the hearing, so the charges were not decided on their merits.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,232.36 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
Mr [name] had been paying an interim service charge for 2023/24 of £109.31
- total demanded
The sums in dispute were stated to be £2,232.36.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.