Flat 12, 6 Trinity Mews, London E1 3BT
LON/00BG/LAC/2020/0009 · administration charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 26 Feb 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that a ground rent collection fee of £30 plus VAT per demand is payable, rather than the £36 including VAT charged, and that the landlord cannot recover fees for registering subleases because the tribunal has no jurisdiction over that issue.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Avon Ground Rents Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Avon Ground Rents Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £30.00 plus VAT is payable by the Applicants in respect of each demand of ground rents made by the Respondent.
- items reduced
The particular charges referred to us are a collection fee of £36.00 including VAT for the period 1 July 2019 to 31 December 2019
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.