Flat 1,127 Ifield Road, London, SW10 9AR
LON/00AW/LSC/2025/1064 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 27 Jul 2026
The tribunal set the insurance premium payable by the leaseholder for 2019 to 2025 at a share of the premiums, the tribunal found the consultation issue outside its jurisdiction, and it made an order that the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2019-2025 inclusive
- outcome
2021-2022 3/10th of £4,688.50 £1,406.55
- items reduced
The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of the insurance premiums is as follows
- s20c
the tribunal nonetheless determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.