Flat 11, Victoria Place, Victoria Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 3EE
HAV/00HP/LVA/2024/0500 · LVA · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 30 Apr 2025
The tribunal decided the leaseholder is not liable to pay three £60 administration charges for rent collection on the ground rent, because no summary of rights was served with the demand and the lease does not allow such a fee, and ordered a refund of any sums paid, a s.20C order and reimbursement of the application fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Ltd
- outcome
I determine that the Applicant is not liable to pay the three demands of £60
- items reduced
I determine that the Applicant is not liable to pay the three demands of £60
- s20c
I make an order pursuant to Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
the Respondent shall reimburse the Applicant’s application fee of £100
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.